public interface ChronoLocalDate extends Temporal, TemporalAdjuster, Comparable<ChronoLocalDate>
Most applications should declare method signatures, fields and variables
as LocalDate
, not this interface.
A ChronoLocalDate
is the abstract representation of a date where the
Chronology chronology
, or calendar system, is pluggable.
The date is defined in terms of fields expressed by TemporalField
,
where most common implementations are defined in ChronoField
.
The chronology defines how the calendar system operates and the meaning of
the standard fields.
LocalDate
rather than this
interface, even in the case where the application needs to deal with multiple
calendar systems.
This concept can seem surprising at first, as the natural way to globalize an
application might initially appear to be to abstract the calendar system.
However, as explored below, abstracting the calendar system is usually the wrong
approach, resulting in logic errors and hard to find bugs.
As such, it should be considered an application-wide architectural decision to choose
to use this interface as opposed to LocalDate
.
1) Applications using this interface, as opposed to using just LocalDate
,
face a significantly higher probability of bugs. This is because the calendar system
in use is not known at development time. A key cause of bugs is where the developer
applies assumptions from their day-to-day knowledge of the ISO calendar system
to code that is intended to deal with any arbitrary calendar system.
The section below outlines how those assumptions can cause problems
The primary mechanism for reducing this increased risk of bugs is a strong code review process.
This should also be considered a extra cost in maintenance for the lifetime of the code.
2) This interface does not enforce immutability of implementations.
While the implementation notes indicate that all implementations must be immutable
there is nothing in the code or type system to enforce this. Any method declared
to accept a ChronoLocalDate
could therefore be passed a poorly or
maliciously written mutable implementation.
3) Applications using this interface must consider the impact of eras.
LocalDate
shields users from the concept of eras, by ensuring that getYear()
returns the proleptic year. That decision ensures that developers can think of
LocalDate
instances as consisting of three fields - year, month-of-year and day-of-month.
By contrast, users of this interface must think of dates as consisting of four fields -
era, year-of-era, month-of-year and day-of-month. The extra era field is frequently
forgotten, yet it is of vital importance to dates in an arbitrary calendar system.
For example, in the Japanese calendar system, the era represents the reign of an Emperor.
Whenever one reign ends and another starts, the year-of-era is reset to one.
4) The only agreed international standard for passing a date between two systems is the ISO-8601 standard which requires the ISO calendar system. Using this interface throughout the application will inevitably lead to the requirement to pass the date across a network or component boundary, requiring an application specific protocol or format.
5) Long term persistence, such as a database, will almost always only accept dates in the ISO-8601 calendar system (or the related Julian-Gregorian). Passing around dates in other calendar systems increases the complications of interacting with persistence.
6) Most of the time, passing a ChronoLocalDate
throughout an application
is unnecessary, as discussed in the last section below.
Code that queries the day-of-month and assumes that the value will never be more than 31 is invalid. Some calendar systems have more than 31 days in some months.
Code that adds 12 months to a date and assumes that a year has been added is invalid. Some calendar systems have a different number of months, such as 13 in the Coptic or Ethiopic.
Code that adds one month to a date and assumes that the month-of-year value will increase by one or wrap to the next year is invalid. Some calendar systems have a variable number of months in a year, such as the Hebrew.
Code that adds one month, then adds a second one month and assumes that the day-of-month will remain close to its original value is invalid. Some calendar systems have a large difference between the length of the longest month and the length of the shortest month. For example, the Coptic or Ethiopic have 12 months of 30 days and 1 month of 5 days.
Code that adds seven days and assumes that a week has been added is invalid. Some calendar systems have weeks of other than seven days, such as the French Revolutionary.
Code that assumes that because the year of date1
is greater than the year of date2
then date1
is after date2
is invalid. This is invalid for all calendar systems
when referring to the year-of-era, and especially untrue of the Japanese calendar system
where the year-of-era restarts with the reign of every new Emperor.
Code that treats month-of-year one and day-of-month one as the start of the year is invalid. Not all calendar systems start the year when the month value is one.
In general, manipulating a date, and even querying a date, is wide open to bugs when the calendar system is unknown at development time. This is why it is essential that code using this interface is subjected to additional code reviews. It is also why an architectural decision to avoid this interface type is usually the correct one.
LocalDate
.
LocalDate
to and from the user's preferred calendar system during
printing and parsing
As discussed above, performing calculations on a date where the rules of the calendar system are pluggable requires skill and is not recommended. Fortunately, the need to perform calculations on a date in an arbitrary calendar system is extremely rare. For example, it is highly unlikely that the business rules of a library book rental scheme will allow rentals to be for one month, where meaning of the month is dependent on the user's preferred calendar system.
A key use case for calculations on a date in an arbitrary calendar system is producing a month-by-month calendar for display and user interaction. Again, this is a UI issue, and use of this interface solely within a few methods of the UI layer may be justified.
In any other part of the system, where a date must be manipulated in a calendar system other than ISO, the use case will generally specify the calendar system to use. For example, an application may need to calculate the next Islamic or Hebrew holiday which may require manipulating the date. This kind of use case can be handled as follows:
LocalDate
being passed to the method
LocalDate
TemporalAccessor
if read-only access is required, or use Temporal
if read-write access is required.
This interface must be implemented with care to ensure other classes operate correctly. All implementations that can be instantiated must be final, immutable and thread-safe. Subclasses should be Serializable wherever possible.
Additional calendar systems may be added to the system.
See Chronology
for more details.
Modifier and Type | Method and Description |
---|---|
Temporal |
adjustInto(Temporal temporal)
Adjusts the specified temporal object to have the same date as this object.
|
ChronoLocalDateTime<?> |
atTime(LocalTime localTime)
Combines this date with a time to create a
ChronoLocalDateTime . |
int |
compareTo(ChronoLocalDate other)
Compares this date to another date, including the chronology.
|
boolean |
equals(Object obj)
Checks if this date is equal to another date, including the chronology.
|
Chronology |
getChronology()
Gets the chronology of this date.
|
Era |
getEra()
Gets the era, as defined by the chronology.
|
int |
hashCode()
A hash code for this date.
|
boolean |
isAfter(ChronoLocalDate other)
Checks if this date is after the specified date ignoring the chronology.
|
boolean |
isBefore(ChronoLocalDate other)
Checks if this date is before the specified date ignoring the chronology.
|
boolean |
isEqual(ChronoLocalDate other)
Checks if this date is equal to the specified date ignoring the chronology.
|
boolean |
isLeapYear()
Checks if the year is a leap year, as defined by the calendar system.
|
boolean |
isSupported(TemporalField field)
Checks if the specified field is supported.
|
boolean |
isSupported(TemporalUnit unit)
Checks if the specified unit is supported.
|
int |
lengthOfMonth()
Returns the length of the month represented by this date, as defined by the calendar system.
|
int |
lengthOfYear()
Returns the length of the year represented by this date, as defined by the calendar system.
|
ChronoLocalDate |
minus(long amountToSubtract,
TemporalUnit unit)
Returns an object of the same type as this object with the specified period subtracted.
|
ChronoLocalDate |
minus(TemporalAmount amount)
Returns an object of the same type as this object with an amount subtracted.
|
ChronoLocalDate |
plus(long amountToAdd,
TemporalUnit unit)
Returns an object of the same type as this object with the specified period added.
|
ChronoLocalDate |
plus(TemporalAmount amount)
Returns an object of the same type as this object with an amount added.
|
long |
toEpochDay()
Converts this date to the Epoch Day.
|
String |
toString()
Outputs this date as a
String . |
ChronoPeriod |
until(ChronoLocalDate endDateExclusive)
Calculates the period between this date and another date as a
ChronoPeriod . |
long |
until(Temporal endExclusive,
TemporalUnit unit)
Calculates the amount of time until another date in terms of the specified unit.
|
ChronoLocalDate |
with(TemporalAdjuster adjuster)
Returns an adjusted object of the same type as this object with the adjustment made.
|
ChronoLocalDate |
with(TemporalField field,
long newValue)
Returns an object of the same type as this object with the specified field altered.
|
get, getLong, query, range
Temporal adjustInto(Temporal temporal)
This returns a temporal object of the same observable type as the input with the date changed to be the same as this.
The adjustment is equivalent to using Temporal.with(TemporalField, long)
passing ChronoField.EPOCH_DAY
as the field.
In most cases, it is clearer to reverse the calling pattern by using
Temporal.with(TemporalAdjuster)
:
// these two lines are equivalent, but the second approach is recommended temporal = thisLocalDate.adjustInto(temporal); temporal = temporal.with(thisLocalDate);
This instance is immutable and unaffected by this method call.
adjustInto
in interface TemporalAdjuster
temporal
- the target object to be adjusted, not nullDateTimeException
- if unable to make the adjustmentChronoLocalDateTime<?> atTime(LocalTime localTime)
ChronoLocalDateTime
.
This returns a ChronoLocalDateTime
formed from this date at the specified time.
All possible combinations of date and time are valid.
localTime
- the local time to use, not nullint compareTo(ChronoLocalDate other)
The comparison is based first on the underlying time-line date, then
on the chronology.
It is "consistent with equals", as defined by Comparable
.
For example, the following is the comparator order:
2012-12-03 (ISO)
2012-12-04 (ISO)
2555-12-04 (ThaiBuddhist)
2012-12-05 (ISO)
If all the date objects being compared are in the same chronology, then the
additional chronology stage is not required and only the local date is used.
To compare the dates of two TemporalAccessor
instances, including dates
in two different chronologies, use ChronoField.EPOCH_DAY
as a comparator.
This default implementation performs the comparison defined above.
compareTo
in interface Comparable<ChronoLocalDate>
other
- the other date to compare to, not nullboolean equals(@Nullable Object obj)
Compares this date with another ensuring that the date and chronology are the same.
To compare the dates of two TemporalAccessor
instances, including dates
in two different chronologies, use ChronoField.EPOCH_DAY
as a comparator.
equals
in class Object
obj
- the object to check, null returns falseObject.hashCode()
,
HashMap
Chronology getChronology()
The Chronology
represents the calendar system in use.
The era and other fields in ChronoField
are defined by the chronology.
Era getEra()
The era is, conceptually, the largest division of the time-line.
Most calendar systems have a single epoch dividing the time-line into two eras.
However, some have multiple eras, such as one for the reign of each leader.
The exact meaning is determined by the Chronology
.
All correctly implemented Era
classes are singletons, thus it
is valid code to write date.getEra() == SomeChrono.ERA_NAME)
.
This default implementation uses Chronology.eraOf(int)
.
int hashCode()
hashCode
in class Object
Object.equals(java.lang.Object)
,
System.identityHashCode(java.lang.Object)
boolean isAfter(ChronoLocalDate other)
This method differs from the comparison in compareTo(java.time.chrono.ChronoLocalDate)
in that it
only compares the underlying date and not the chronology.
This allows dates in different calendar systems to be compared based
on the time-line position.
This is equivalent to using date1.toEpochDay() > date2.toEpochDay()
.
This default implementation performs the comparison based on the epoch-day.
other
- the other date to compare to, not nullboolean isBefore(ChronoLocalDate other)
This method differs from the comparison in compareTo(java.time.chrono.ChronoLocalDate)
in that it
only compares the underlying date and not the chronology.
This allows dates in different calendar systems to be compared based
on the time-line position.
This is equivalent to using date1.toEpochDay() < date2.toEpochDay()
.
This default implementation performs the comparison based on the epoch-day.
other
- the other date to compare to, not nullboolean isEqual(ChronoLocalDate other)
This method differs from the comparison in compareTo(java.time.chrono.ChronoLocalDate)
in that it
only compares the underlying date and not the chronology.
This allows dates in different calendar systems to be compared based
on the time-line position.
This is equivalent to using date1.toEpochDay() == date2.toEpochDay()
.
This default implementation performs the comparison based on the epoch-day.
other
- the other date to compare to, not nullboolean isLeapYear()
A leap-year is a year of a longer length than normal. The exact meaning is determined by the chronology with the constraint that a leap-year must imply a year-length longer than a non leap-year.
This default implementation uses Chronology.isLeapYear(long)
.
boolean isSupported(@Nullable TemporalField field)
This checks if the specified field can be queried on this date.
If false, then calling the range
,
get
and with(TemporalField, long)
methods will throw an exception.
The set of supported fields is defined by the chronology and normally includes
all ChronoField
date fields.
If the field is not a ChronoField
, then the result of this method
is obtained by invoking TemporalField.isSupportedBy(TemporalAccessor)
passing this
as the argument.
Whether the field is supported is determined by the field.
isSupported
in interface TemporalAccessor
field
- the field to check, null returns falseboolean isSupported(@Nullable TemporalUnit unit)
This checks if the specified unit can be added to or subtracted from this date.
If false, then calling the plus(long, TemporalUnit)
and
minus
methods will throw an exception.
The set of supported units is defined by the chronology and normally includes
all ChronoUnit
date units except FOREVER
.
If the unit is not a ChronoUnit
, then the result of this method
is obtained by invoking TemporalUnit.isSupportedBy(Temporal)
passing this
as the argument.
Whether the unit is supported is determined by the unit.
isSupported
in interface Temporal
unit
- the unit to check, null returns falseint lengthOfMonth()
This returns the length of the month in days.
int lengthOfYear()
This returns the length of the year in days.
The default implementation uses isLeapYear()
and returns 365 or 366.
ChronoLocalDate minus(long amountToSubtract, TemporalUnit unit)
This method returns a new object based on this one with the specified period subtracted. For example, on a
LocalDate
, this could be used to subtract a number of years, months or days. The returned object will
have the same observable type as this object.
In some cases, changing a field is not fully defined. For example, if the target object is a date representing the 31st March, then subtracting one month would be unclear. In cases like this, the field is responsible for resolving the result. Typically it will choose the previous valid date, which would be the last valid day of February in this example.
Implementations must behave in a manor equivalent to the default method behavior.
Implementations must not alter this object. Instead, an adjusted copy of the original must be returned. This provides equivalent, safe behavior for immutable and mutable implementations.
The default implementation must behave equivalent to this code:
return (amountToSubtract == Long.MIN_VALUE ? plus(Long.MAX_VALUE, unit).plus(1, unit) : plus(-amountToSubtract, unit));
minus
in interface Temporal
amountToSubtract
- the amount of the specified unit to subtract, may be negativeunit
- the unit of the amount to subtract, not nullDateTimeException
- if the unit cannot be subtractedUnsupportedTemporalTypeException
- if the unit is not supportedChronoLocalDate minus(TemporalAmount amount)
This adjusts this temporal, subtracting according to the rules of the specified amount. The amount is typically a
Period
but may be any other type implementing the TemporalAmount
interface, such as
Duration
.
Some example code indicating how and why this method is used:
date = date.minus(period); // subtract a Period instance date = date.minus(duration); // subtract a Duration instance date = date.minus(workingDays(6)); // example user-written workingDays method
Note that calling plus
followed by minus
is not guaranteed to return the same date-time.
Implementations must not alter either this object or the specified temporal object. Instead, an adjusted copy of the original must be returned. This provides equivalent, safe behavior for immutable and mutable implementations.
The default implementation must behave equivalent to this code:
return amount.subtractFrom(this);
minus
in interface Temporal
amount
- the amount to subtract, not nullDateTimeException
- if the subtraction cannot be madeChronoLocalDate plus(long amountToAdd, TemporalUnit unit)
This method returns a new object based on this one with the specified period added. For example, on a
LocalDate
, this could be used to add a number of years, months or days. The returned object will have the
same observable type as this object.
In some cases, changing a field is not fully defined. For example, if the target object is a date representing the 31st January, then adding one month would be unclear. In cases like this, the field is responsible for resolving the result. Typically it will choose the previous valid date, which would be the last valid day of February in this example.
Implementations must check and handle all units defined in ChronoUnit
. If the unit is
supported, then the addition must be performed. If unsupported, then an
UnsupportedTemporalTypeException
must be thrown.
If the unit is not a ChronoUnit
, then the result of this method is obtained by invoking
TemporalUnit.addTo(Temporal, long)
passing this
as the first argument.
Implementations must not alter this object. Instead, an adjusted copy of the original must be returned. This provides equivalent, safe behavior for immutable and mutable implementations.
plus
in interface Temporal
amountToAdd
- the amount of the specified unit to add, may be negativeunit
- the unit of the amount to add, not nullDateTimeException
- if the unit cannot be addedChronoLocalDate plus(TemporalAmount amount)
This adjusts this temporal, adding according to the rules of the specified amount. The amount is typically a
Period
but may be any other type implementing the TemporalAmount
interface, such as
Duration
.
Some example code indicating how and why this method is used:
date = date.plus(period); // add a Period instance date = date.plus(duration); // add a Duration instance date = date.plus(workingDays(6)); // example user-written workingDays method
Note that calling plus
followed by minus
is not guaranteed to return the same date-time.
Implementations must not alter either this object or the specified temporal object. Instead, an adjusted copy of the original must be returned. This provides equivalent, safe behavior for immutable and mutable implementations.
The default implementation must behave equivalent to this code:
return amount.addTo(this);
plus
in interface Temporal
amount
- the amount to add, not nullDateTimeException
- if the addition cannot be madelong toEpochDay()
The Epoch Day count
is a simple
incrementing count of days where day 0 is 1970-01-01 (ISO).
This definition is the same for all chronologies, enabling conversion.
This default implementation queries the EPOCH_DAY
field.
String toString()
String
.
The output will include the full local date.
ChronoPeriod until(ChronoLocalDate endDateExclusive)
ChronoPeriod
.
This calculates the period between two dates. All supplied chronologies
calculate the period using years, months and days, however the
ChronoPeriod
API allows the period to be represented using other units.
The start and end points are this
and the specified date.
The result will be negative if the end is before the start.
The negative sign will be the same in each of year, month and day.
The calculation is performed using the chronology of this date. If necessary, the input date will be converted to match.
This instance is immutable and unaffected by this method call.
endDateExclusive
- the end date, exclusive, which may be in any chronology, not nullDateTimeException
- if the period cannot be calculatedlong until(Temporal endExclusive, TemporalUnit unit)
This calculates the amount of time between two ChronoLocalDate
objects in terms of a single TemporalUnit
.
The start and end points are this
and the specified date.
The result will be negative if the end is before the start.
The Temporal
passed to this method is converted to a
ChronoLocalDate
using Chronology.date(TemporalAccessor)
.
The calculation returns a whole number, representing the number of
complete units between the two dates.
For example, the amount in days between two dates can be calculated
using startDate.until(endDate, DAYS)
.
There are two equivalent ways of using this method.
The first is to invoke this method.
The second is to use TemporalUnit.between(Temporal, Temporal)
:
// these two lines are equivalent amount = start.until(end, MONTHS); amount = MONTHS.between(start, end);The choice should be made based on which makes the code more readable.
The calculation is implemented in this method for ChronoUnit
.
The units DAYS
, WEEKS
, MONTHS
, YEARS
,
DECADES
, CENTURIES
, MILLENNIA
and ERAS
should be supported by all implementations.
Other ChronoUnit
values will throw an exception.
If the unit is not a ChronoUnit
, then the result of this method
is obtained by invoking TemporalUnit.between(Temporal, Temporal)
passing this
as the first argument and the converted input temporal as
the second argument.
This instance is immutable and unaffected by this method call.
until
in interface Temporal
endExclusive
- the end date, exclusive, which is converted to a
ChronoLocalDate
in the same chronology, not nullunit
- the unit to measure the amount in, not nullDateTimeException
- if the amount cannot be calculated, or the end
temporal cannot be converted to a ChronoLocalDate
UnsupportedTemporalTypeException
- if the unit is not supportedChronoLocalDate with(TemporalAdjuster adjuster)
This adjusts this date-time according to the rules of the specified adjuster. A simple adjuster might simply set
the one of the fields, such as the year field. A more complex adjuster might set the date to the last day of the
month. A selection of common adjustments is provided in TemporalAdjusters
. These include finding the "last day of the month" and "next Wednesday". The adjuster is
responsible for handling special cases, such as the varying lengths of month and leap years.
Some example code indicating how and why this method is used:
date = date.with(Month.JULY); // most key classes implement TemporalAdjuster date = date.with(lastDayOfMonth()); // static import from Adjusters date = date.with(next(WEDNESDAY)); // static import from Adjusters and DayOfWeekimplSpec
Implementations must not alter either this object or the specified temporal object. Instead, an adjusted copy of the original must be returned. This provides equivalent, safe behavior for immutable and mutable implementations.
The default implementation must behave equivalent to this code:
return adjuster.adjustInto(this);
with
in interface Temporal
adjuster
- the adjuster to use, not nullDateTimeException
- if unable to make the adjustmentChronoLocalDate with(TemporalField field, long newValue)
This returns a new object based on this one with the value for the specified field changed. For example, on a
LocalDate
, this could be used to set the year, month or day-of-month. The returned object will have the
same observable type as this object.
In some cases, changing a field is not fully defined. For example, if the target object is a date representing the 31st January, then changing the month to February would be unclear. In cases like this, the field is responsible for resolving the result. Typically it will choose the previous valid date, which would be the last valid day of February in this example.
Implementations must check and handle all fields defined in ChronoField
. If the field is
supported, then the adjustment must be performed. If unsupported, then an
UnsupportedTemporalTypeException
must be thrown.
If the field is not a ChronoField
, then the result of this method is obtained by invoking
TemporalField.adjustInto(Temporal, long)
passing this
as the first argument.
Implementations must not alter this object. Instead, an adjusted copy of the original must be returned. This provides equivalent, safe behavior for immutable and mutable implementations.
with
in interface Temporal
field
- the field to set in the result, not nullnewValue
- the new value of the field in the resultDateTimeException
- if the field cannot be setUnsupportedTemporalTypeException
- if the field is not supported